Home page |
Updated on November 28, 2005 |
|
|
2P/Encke | 2005 TF50 | 2005 UW6 | 2005 UY6 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
q | 0.338 A.U. | 0.294 A.U. | 0.523 A.U. | 0.287 A.U. |
e | 0.847 | 0.869 | 0.743 | 0.873 |
L | 161 | 161 | 155 | 164 |
B | -1 | 4 | -0 | -0 |
Peri. | 186 | 160 | 180 | 181 |
Node | 335 | 1 | 335 | 344 |
Incl. | 12 | 11 | 1 | 12 |
P | 3.3 years | 3.4 years | 2.9 years | 3.4 years |
H | 14.2 mag | 20.2 mag | 21.8 mag | 18.2 mag |
Comet 2P/Encke looks asteroidal around the aphelion with an absolute magnitude of H = 14.2 mag. You can see the light curve of Comet 2P/Encke at:
http://www.aerith.net/comet/catalog/0002P/2003.html
If the three new asteroids were really associated with Comet 2P/Encke, they might showed cometary activity around the perihelion.
Assuming the cometary light curve similar to Comet 2P/Encke and the brightness difference based on the absolute magnitude H, here shows the ephemeris of these three new asteroids with impracticable brightness prediction. Observations are encouraged.
In 2005, we have two bright new periodic comets, originally reported as faint asteroids, P/2005 JQ5 and 169P/2002 EX12. The nuclear absolute magnitude of them are 17.5 mag and 16.0 mag respectively. The brightness of 2005 UY6 is similar to them. The other two may be too faint to show the cometary activity.
2005 TF50 was discovered on 2005 October 10 at 21.1 mag by M. Block, Steward Observatory, Kitt Peak, and announced in M.P.E.C. 2005-T83:
http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/mpec/K05/K05T83.html
The absolute magnitude of 20.2 mag. So 2005 TF50 is fainter than Comet 2P/Encke by 6 mag. Assuming the light curve similar to Comet 2P/Encke, 2005 TF50 may be very bright in the evening sky in 2005 November and December.
The condition in this autumn is excellent to detect the cometary activity of 2005 TF50. Although the brightness prediction in M.P.E.C. is extremely faint, observations are encouraged.
Here is the light curve of 2005 TF50:
The red curve shows the brightness if it shows cometary activity similar to Comet 2P/Encke. The green curve shows the brightness as an asteroid.
Here is the ephemeris in the Northern Hemisphere based on the orbital elements calculated from 27 observations between Oct. 10 and 23:
2005 TF50 Date R.A. Decl. r d Ph.A Elong m1 m2 Best Time(A, h) Oct. 10 1 9.85 16 15.4 1.699 0.706 5 170 20.8 21.1 23:50 ( 0, 71) 15 0 52.57 15 39.2 1.634 0.643 5 170 20.2 20.8 23:13 ( 0, 71) 20 0 32.26 14 45.2 1.568 0.589 10 163 19.5 20.7 22:33 ( 0, 70) 25 0 9.11 13 30.6 1.500 0.543 17 153 18.9 20.7 21:50 ( 0, 68) 30 23 43.67 11 54.6 1.430 0.508 24 142 18.2 20.7 21:05 ( 0, 67) Nov. 4 23 16.80 9 59.3 1.358 0.482 33 131 17.5 20.7 20:19 ( 0, 65) 9 22 49.50 7 50.0 1.283 0.465 42 119 16.8 20.7 19:32 ( 0, 63) 14 22 22.64 5 33.4 1.206 0.455 51 107 16.1 20.8 18:46 ( 0, 60) 19 21 56.74 3 15.5 1.126 0.451 60 95 15.4 20.9 18:20 ( 9, 58) 24 21 31.89 0 59.9 1.043 0.451 70 84 14.7 21.0 18:18 ( 26, 53) 29 21 7.80 -1 12.5 0.957 0.455 80 72 14.5 21.2 18:18 ( 40, 46) Dec. 4 20 43.76 -3 23.8 0.867 0.460 90 61 14.2 21.4 18:18 ( 50, 38) 9 20 18.83 -5 38.7 0.774 0.467 102 50 13.9 21.7 18:18 ( 58, 29) 14 19 51.94 -8 3.2 0.677 0.479 115 38 13.5 22.3 18:19 ( 65, 18) 19 19 22.43 -10 43.1 0.577 0.501 131 25 13.1 23.4 18:21 ( 71, 7) 24 18 50.91 -13 40.4 0.476 0.541 150 13 12.7 25.8 18:24 ( 77, -5) 29 18 20.96 -16 51.1 0.382 0.613 162 6 12.3 28.8 5:36 (282,-13) Jan. 3 18 0.78 -20 4.7 0.311 0.735 136 12 12.1 23.4 5:38 (290, -6) 8 18 0.06 -22 59.1 0.297 0.903 96 17 12.4 20.8 5:38 (295, -4) 13 18 17.05 -25 1.5 0.349 1.079 64 18 13.3 20.4 5:38 (298, -5) 18 18 40.65 -26 6.3 0.438 1.234 46 18 14.2 20.6 5:38 (298, -6) 23 19 4.43 -26 30.1 0.537 1.366 36 18 15.1 21.0 5:36 (297, -7) 28 19 26.48 -26 28.2 0.638 1.482 30 19 16.1 21.4 5:34 (297, -8) Feb. 2 19 46.49 -26 10.4 0.736 1.584 26 19 17.2 21.7 5:31 (296, -8) 7 20 4.59 -25 42.7 0.830 1.676 24 20 18.2 22.1 5:28 (296, -9) 12 20 20.98 -25 9.0 0.922 1.759 23 22 19.0 22.4 5:24 (295, -8) 17 20 35.92 -24 31.7 1.009 1.833 23 23 19.7 22.6 5:19 (294, -8) 22 20 49.58 -23 52.4 1.093 1.900 22 25 20.3 22.9 5:14 (294, -7) 27 21 2.14 -23 12.3 1.175 1.960 22 27 20.9 23.1 5:08 (294, -7) Mar. 4 21 13.72 -22 32.3 1.253 2.013 23 29 21.4 23.3 5:02 (293, -6) |
Even if it were a bright comet, it had been too difficult to detect the cometary activity in its last several perihelion passages, except for 1995 October, when it must have been bright in the morning sky.
Tomohiko Sekiguchi pointed out that the condition in next return in 2009 is very bad.
A remarkable rendezvous event happens during this campaign. 2005 TF50 will pass extremely close by Comet 168P/Hergenrother on November 16.
2005 Nov. 16 12h UT 0.032 deg ( 1.9 arcmin) 2005 TF50 22h09m.6 +04o24' 20.8 mag 168P/2005 N2 ( Hergenrother ) 22h09m.7 +04o24' 16.7 mag |
2005 UW6 was discovered on 2005 October 29 at 20.9 mag by R. S. McMillan, Steward Observatory, Kitt Peak, and announced in M.P.E.C. 2005-U102:
http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/mpec/K05/K05UA2.html
Comet 2P/Encke begins to show the cometary activity 100 days prior to the perihelion passage. But 2005 UW6 was discovered 66 days prior to the perihelion passage as an asteroid. It is much fainter than Comet 2P/Encke. The perihelion distance is much larger than Comet 2P/Encke. Therefore, it is less likely to show the cometary activity.
It passes only 0.05 A.U. from the earth on November 19 and it is observable in good condition in mid November.
Here is the ephemeris in the Northern Hemisphere based on the orbital elements calculated from 48 observations between Oct. 29 and Nov. 19:
2005 UW6 Date R.A. Decl. r d Ph.A Elong m2 Best Time(A, h) Nov. 1 4 34.52 26 12.8 1.222 0.262 25 147 20.5 1:53 ( 0, 81) 4 4 43.36 27 13.1 1.184 0.219 26 148 20.1 1:50 ( 0, 82) 7 4 55.91 28 35.8 1.145 0.177 27 148 19.6 1:50 ( 0, 83) 10 5 15.80 30 36.3 1.107 0.136 29 146 19.0 1:57 ( 0, 85) 13 5 52.79 33 41.0 1.067 0.098 35 140 18.4 2:20 ( 0, 88) 16 7 18.73 37 40.1 1.028 0.064 51 126 17.8 3:29 (180, 88) 19 10 35.50 31 28.3 0.988 0.046 88 88 18.2 5:10 (273, 73) 22 13 17.31 8 21.7 0.948 0.060 130 47 21.3 5:12 (281, 31) 25 14 21.80 -4 10.0 0.908 0.092 147 29 24.4 5:15 (283, 12) 28 14 51.63 -9 50.5 0.868 0.131 153 23 26.2 5:17 (286, 5) Dec. 1 15 8.61 -12 54.5 0.828 0.172 154 20 27.0 5:19 (288, 3) |
The conditions had been very bad in every perihelion passage during last 15 years.
2005 UY6 was discovered on 2005 October 29 at 19.9 mag by R. Bambery, M. Hicks, K. Lawrence, E. Helin, R. Thicksten in the course of NEAT, and announced in M.P.E.C. 2005-U103:
http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/mpec/K05/K05UA3.html
The absolute magnitude of 18.2 mag. So 2005 UY6 is fainter than Comet 2P/Encke by 4 mag. Assuming the light curve similar to Comet 2P/Encke, 2005 UY6 may be very bright in the evening sky in 2006 January.
Here is the light curve of 2005 UY6:
The red curve shows the brightness if it shows cometary activity similar to Comet 2P/Encke. The green curve shows the brightness as an asteroid.
Here is the ephemeris in the Northern Hemisphere based on the orbital elements calculated from 24 observations between Oct. 29 and Nov. 20:
2005 UY6 Date R.A. Decl. r d Ph.A Elong m1 m2 Best Time(A, h) Nov. 1 23 34.93 12 21.1 1.840 0.974 20 138 20.4 20.5 20:50 ( 0, 67) 11 23 12.36 9 50.2 1.717 0.962 28 123 19.6 20.6 19:49 ( 0, 65) 21 22 54.65 7 31.5 1.588 0.966 36 108 18.7 20.6 18:52 ( 0, 62) Dec. 1 22 42.23 5 37.0 1.450 0.976 42 95 17.8 20.6 18:18 ( 9, 60) 11 22 34.60 4 10.0 1.304 0.981 48 83 16.6 20.6 18:19 ( 30, 56) 21 22 30.63 3 6.7 1.147 0.972 54 71 15.2 20.4 18:22 ( 46, 49) 31 22 28.76 2 17.0 0.978 0.941 61 61 14.1 20.2 18:28 ( 58, 41) Jan. 10 22 26.47 1 19.9 0.795 0.881 71 50 13.3 19.9 18:36 ( 67, 31) 20 22 18.08 -0 39.6 0.598 0.789 89 37 12.2 19.7 18:44 ( 75, 19) 30 21 48.31 -6 26.3 0.397 0.687 128 18 10.7 21.0 18:52 ( 82, -1) Feb. 9 20 47.93 -18 17.3 0.287 0.747 140 10 9.9 21.8 5:26 (284,-12) 19 20 42.54 -23 1.4 0.416 1.035 71 23 11.7 18.9 5:17 (293, -7) Mar. 1 21 7.32 -22 37.0 0.618 1.278 49 28 13.6 19.5 5:06 (293, -6) 11 21 32.13 -21 12.2 0.814 1.459 40 32 15.7 20.2 4:53 (292, -5) 21 21 53.60 -19 38.4 0.995 1.594 36 36 17.3 20.7 4:38 (291, -4) 31 22 11.84 -18 9.3 1.163 1.693 35 42 18.5 21.1 4:23 (291, -2) |
Even if it were a bright comet, it had been too difficult to detect the cometary activity in its last several perihelion passages, except for 1995 November, when the condition was excellent.
Special thanks to Alan W. Harris.
Special thanks to Katsuhito Ohtsuka.